Unity of command ensures there is a single person in charge for each objective.

• A. A single person in charge for each objective
• B. Multiple people in charge of the same objective
• C. A panel of experts makes all decisions
• D. No defined command structure

Answer: (A)

Unity of command means every objective at the incident has a single supervisor responsible for directing all actions related to that objective. This creates a clear line of authority, so everyone knows who to report to, who approves the next steps, and how decisions are coordinated with the overall incident plan. With one person in charge of each objective, orders are consistent, accountability is clear, and the team can move efficiently without competing directives.

Choosing multiple people as in charge would lead to conflicting guidance and confusion, slowing response and undermining coordination. A panel of experts making all decisions would be impractical for rapid incident response and would blur accountability. No defined command structure would result in chaos and unsafe conditions. Therefore, having a single person in charge for each objective best embodies unity of command.